Showing posts with label integral. Show all posts
Showing posts with label integral. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

linda linklink

Integration Training - Associates Contract

We do things a little differently at business training providers Integration Training and I wanted to share a taste of that (transparency being a core principle in how we operate). Below is our associates agreement - unedited - the first part is what makes it unusual I think. The associates community is one I really value and is unashamedly elitist and somewhat difficult to become a part of...

As an aside - those familiar with the integral model may notice I, we and it elements in the agreement below:

...............

Integration Training (IT) is a team of trainers, coaches and administrative staff dedicated to:

  • Awesome training
  • Their own personal and professional development
  • Being part of a mutually supportive community
  • Something bigger (each person has their own larger “for the sake of what” or “higher power”).

NB: ”IT” in this document refers to the leadership/administrative arm of IT – Mark Walsh and staff.

Associate Work - Principles:

Service

Work is undertaken with the spirit of service to self, client, IT and something bigger. Our multiple bottom-lines are (but not limited to) money, learning, contribution to a better world and fun.

Choice

Associates may choose to decline any work and Mark is not obliged to offer work.

Transparency/ Dialogue

What IT will get paid by a client and what associates are paid will be transparent. The fundamental principles of all associate work are dialogue and openness.

Specifics

Stage of Involvement

Associates may become involved at earlier of later stages of work as they like. For example some associates don’t mind meeting clients to discuss work prior to a sale (and risking there may be no sale), others would like to be involved when sold in design, others just in the delivery.

Fees

Fees will be negotiable in each instance. Approx:

10% - This is the minimal fee IT will work with for “handovers” where all I do is receive a call and pass on details.

30% - This may be a more typical fee for associate work where I have been involved in selling work to a client (face to face or on e-mail).

50% - This is the maximum IT will take. Where IT have sold and designed the work, and an associate only delivers (e.g. for a more off the shelf stress workshop this is likely to be the fee. )

These are just guidelines – the idea is that IT discusses things with associates, being transparent about what the client can pay and then make an offer to associates which they are free to accept or decline.

Payments will go through Integration Training. I contract with clients to get paid within 30 days, I will then immediately pay you.

Repeat Work

All requests for repeat work and further work of any type coming from clients will be directed back to IT (though you can of course tell them your availability). The fee for repeat work I will take will be renegotiable (and likely to drop).

Cancellation

Once committed to undertaking a piece of work IT will expect associates to take full responsibility for ensuring they fulfil (serious illness and family emergencies being the only exceptions).

Branding and Quality

All handouts would be branded Integration Training. IT ensures quality primarily through associate selection. A standing request is that IT have access to client feedback (questionnaires or conversationally).

Expenses

To be included in associates fee, not billed separately.

A Note re Trust and Relationships from Mark

For me putting my business reputation and clients in the hands of anyone else is a matter of great trust – so I have picked associates whom I regard as having impeccable integrity J The standard of reliability I request is also impeccability. Due to who you are, the community and relationships we’ve built I feel comfortable with you all. To me relationships are the base of associate not contracts which are a nice extra and I hope add clarity.

Read More

Thursday, March 18, 2010

linda linklink

Men's Liberation?


Men's Liberation?
Beyond the Disposable Hero
- from Integral Life, with Warren Farrell and Ken Wilber


Dr. Warren Farrell talks with Ken Wilber about power, oppression, and the urgent need for men to begin redefining their roles for today's world.

Some key points:

•"Power" is not defined by the amount of control someone has over others, but the amount of control one has over his or her own life.
•Feminism can be defined as freeing females from being coerced into traditional female roles, and the same work needs to be done by men.
•Feminism did a great job of exploring issues of male power and female powerlessness, but not a great job at exploring issues of female power and male powerlessness.
•In terms of recognizing and developing their power, men are in a similar position today as women were in the late 1950's, at the dawn of the feminist movement.
•As long as men do not rise to the challenge of redefining themselves for today's world, women continue to be pressured to learn how to "row on both sides of the boat," while men keep to their own side. The result? The boat just keeps going around in circles....
•In order to succeed, men need to learn from the feminist movements of recent decades, and use their work as a jumping-off pointand not to hold feminism or women's studies as an opposition to men's liberation.
•In order to take a truly comprehensive view of sex and gender, we need to look through at least four lenses: subjective/psychological (e.g. masculine vs. feminine), objective/biological (e.g. male vs. female), intersubjective/cultural (e.g. gender roles and definitions of "man" and "woman"), and interobjective/social (e.g. the techno-economic realities of the time).
Read More

Friday, January 15, 2010

linda linklink

Beautiful Integral Website


One beautiful website on integral, and they do aikido too! Aside from being a beautiful site they have lots of free integral resources...if you're wondering what the hell integral is. Now to look up "atelier"...
Read More

Friday, December 18, 2009

linda linklink

Shades of Green - Levels of Sustainability in Business

Good article from my friend at the Capacity Evolution Blog about how green isn't green isn't green. They claim that there are six distinct levels of sustainability in business:

.........
"Sustainability” is not always sustainable. Simply, doing and describing what you do as sustainable does not make it so. For organizations (and us, personally!) to be sustainable in what we do, we have to be sustainable in who we are and how we see the world. This gives us our best shot at doing something that is actually going to get or generate sustainable results. In the following series of six posts I will introduce the six levels of engaging in sustainability: Compliance, Conformity, Cooperation, Collaboration, Coherence and Constellation. We use these at Interkannections to help our clients clarify their current goals around sustainability and map out their paths for deepening their practice and impact.

Each level includes and transcends the one before it, adding additional functionality and value. CONT."
Read More

Thursday, December 10, 2009

linda linklink

Action Logics


Nice application of integral theory and developmental levels to business from a friend I've never net Zach Smith.

...................

We do as we are. The choices we make and the actions we take are inextricably linked to our capacity to engage the world around us. A large part of that capacity depends on the lenses with which we view the world. These lenses are variously called “mindsets”, “mental models”, “worldview” or in developmental terms–”action logics.” Action logic meaning literally the logic behind our actions.

As we move through life, experience the world and face challenges we routinely engage the world from a set of established action logics. We begin moving through these action logics at birth and have the potential to continue to evolve our worldview all throughout our lives. Recognizable stages a great many of us pass through include:

  • X: At this stage we are opportunists seeking to satisfy our immediate needs. If we need wood we chop down a tree. For more detail click here.
  • G: We tend to conform to social norms, peer pressure and the will of the group. Our wood gathering depends on what and how others are doing it. For more detail click here.
  • I: We value and seek expertise. We believe in and try to follow the “right way.” We place a high value on logic and order. We develop a bureaucracy to manage trees with well-crafted rules for gathering wood. For more detail click here.
  • T: We recognize the value in multiple perspectives and seek to align them to achieve our aims and goals. We recognize and revel in our ability to be self-authoring, creative, effective and successful. Thinking is generally linear. The utility and management practices of trees and forests is rigorously researched and investigated. Short and mid-term timber management planning goals are set. For more detail click here.
cont...
Read More

Sunday, November 29, 2009

linda linklink

Integral Business Resources



There's a whole host of videos, documents and other integral business resources on this page from Fred Kofman's company Axialent.
Read More

Friday, November 27, 2009

linda linklink

Integral and Team Building Cartoons

Brandy Agerbeck does cool "conceptual maps". Here are a couple of integral cartoons of Ken Wilber's quadrants specifically.



Her Belbin Team Roles one is also good for those that are interested in team building:

Read More
Fashion,Fashion Style Ttrends, hair Style, Fashion Style, Fashion Style Fashion,Fashion Style Ttrends, hair Style, Fashion Style, Fashion Style 2015